One app for all your study abroad needs
Brainstorming Ideas
Refer to the following brainstorming ideas to get a solid understanding of the answer.
- The treatment of animals has long been a point of ethical contention, but as our understanding of their sentience and capacity for suffering grows, the question of animal rights takes on a new urgency.
- One of the most compelling arguments for prioritising animal rights lies in the inherent worth of sentient beings. Scientific advancements demonstrate that many animals experience emotions like pain, fear, and joy.
- Denying them basic rights based solely on their species is a form of discrimination. Prioritising animal rights recognises their intrinsic value, extends the circle of moral consideration, and fosters a more compassionate society. A society that values reducing animal suffering is likely to be a society that prioritises peaceful conflict resolution and social justice for all.
- Strict adherence to animal rights could limit access to resources we depend on.
- Food production might be impacted if stricter regulations are placed on livestock farming, and medical research reliant on animal testing could face restrictions.
Q. It is said that animal rights should be prioritized as a critical concern. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this view.
Ans. The treatment of animals has long been a point of ethical contention, but as our understanding of their sentience and capacity for suffering grows, the question of animal rights takes on a new urgency. Elevating animal rights to a critical concern is imperative, but it does come with its price that is often paid by humans.
One of the most compelling arguments for prioritising animal rights lies in the inherent worth of sentient beings. Scientific advancements demonstrate that many animals experience emotions like pain, fear, and joy. Denying them basic rights based solely on their species is a form of discrimination. Prioritising animal rights recognises their intrinsic value, extends the circle of moral consideration, and fosters a more compassionate society. A society that values reducing animal suffering is likely to be a society that prioritises peaceful conflict resolution and social justice for all.
However, there are certain downsides to prioritizing animal rights as well, with the primary concern being that strict adherence to animal rights could limit access to resources we depend on. For example, food production might be impacted if stricter regulations are placed on livestock farming. Additionally, medical research reliant on animal testing could face restrictions, potentially slowing down the development of new treatments. Furthermore, implementing stringent rules that enforce animal rights globally could have significant economic implications, putting a strain on society’s finances. This would pose practical challenges in ensuring good living conditions and preventing harm to all animals, especially wild ones.
In conclusion, prioritising animal rights is not a sentimental luxury, but a moral and practical necessity. It aligns with a growing understanding of animal sentience, fosters a more compassionate society, and promotes environmental sustainability. While challenges undoubtedly exist, the potential benefits for both animals and humanity are undeniable.
Analysis
Paraphrased Statement: The treatment of animals has long been a point of ethical contention, but as our understanding of their sentience and capacity for suffering grows, the question of animal rights takes on a new urgency.
Thesis Statement: Elevating animal rights to a critical concern is imperative, but it does come with its price that is often paid by humans.
Body Paragraph 1– Topic Sentence: One of the most compelling arguments for prioritising animal rights lies in the inherent worth of sentient beings.
Body Paragraph 1 Supporting Reasons and Explanations: Scientific advancements demonstrate that many animals experience emotions like pain, fear, and joy. Denying them basic rights based solely on their species is a form of discrimination. Prioritising animal rights recognises their intrinsic value, extends the circle of moral consideration, and fosters a more compassionate society.
Body Paragraph 2- Topic Sentence: There are certain downsides to prioritizing animal rights as well, with the primary concern being that strict adherence to animal rights could limit access to resources we depend on.
Body Paragraph 2 Supporting Reasons and Explanations: For example, food production might be impacted if stricter regulations are placed on livestock farming. Additionally, medical research reliant on animal testing could face restrictions, potentially slowing down the development of new treatments. Furthermore, implementing stringent rules that enforce animal rights globally could have significant economic implications, putting a strain on society’s finances.
Conclusion: In conclusion, prioritising animal rights is not a sentimental luxury, but a moral and practical necessity. It aligns with a growing understanding of animal sentience, fosters a more compassionate society, and promotes environmental sustainability.
Vocabulary in Use
| Word | Meanings |
| Contention | Disagreement |
| Sentient | Cognizant |
| Intrinsic | Essential, Rudimentary |
| Sentimental | Expressive of or appealing to sentiment, especially tender emotions and feelings, such as love, pity, or nostalgia |
| Sustainability | Ability to maintain or support a process over time. |
| Stringent | Strict |
Linkers and Connectors Used:
Linkers and connectors used here are:
- However
- Additionally
- Furthermore
- In conclusion
Are you preparing for the PTE Exam? Check out the blogs below to bolster your chances of securing better scores in the PTE exam.
Download the Leverage App today.
Need help preparing for PTE? Check out the best PTE preparation courses in the market offered in a live training environment by trusted educators. If you want to help studying abroad, call 1800572130.
25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.