One app for all your study abroad needs
The major difference between contract and tort is based on whether it is a consent-based relationship or it is a non-consensual relationship. The consent-based relationships between parties are covered by contract law. In this, one of the contracting parties consents to carry out a certain task in return for something from the other. Contracts show the parties’ future commitments to one another. The contracting parties anticipate that the commitment will be fulfilled in the future.
On the other hand, non-consensual relationships—in which one party’s conduct or inaction harms another—are the focus of tort law.
A tort is a type of civil wrong that is different from a contract violation. Therefore, the laws governing contractual fault responsibility are different from those governing tort liability. A breach of contract is nothing more than an infringement of legal rights, whereas a tort suggests breaking the law.
We’ll talk about a few of the differences between a contract and a tort here.
Table of Contents
What is a Contract?
The term “contract” refers to any legally enforceable arrangement. Thus, the two essential components of a contract are the agreement and the agreement’s legal enforceability.
The core legal concepts about contracts, such as those about bailment, indemnity, guarantees, agencies, and pledges, are covered under contract law. Its goal is to control how the contract’s parties behave so that disagreements between them can be settled peacefully.
What is Tort?
The goal of tort law is to establish who is responsible for what damage is done to whom. Additionally, it determines the compensation that the defendant must pay the impacted party. The term “harm” in tort law refers to:
- Pain
- Payment of medical expenses
- Loss of future income and suffering
- Property damage
- Unexplainable loss of wages
It’s important to remember that the goal of making amends with the harmed party is to reimburse them for the harm caused to their rights as they existed before the lawsuit.
Also Read: What is the Difference Between Rate and Ratio?
Classification of Tort
The classification of tort is as follows:
- International Tort- As the term implies, an intentional tort occurs when someone knowingly engages in unlawful behaviour that causes harm to another individual. In this case, the injured person must demonstrate that the tort was done with intent or hatred.
Example: Assault, Fraud, Trespass
- Negligence Tort- One in which a party disregards the reasonable care criterion. It must meet the following requirements to be classified as a negligence tort:
- Duty of care
- Violation of that specific duty
- Causation
- Presence of Damages
Examples: Medical malpractice, accidents via vehicles
- Strict Liability Law- The form of culpability that does not pay attention to the presence of intention, negligence or mental state of the accused-accused.
Examples: Planting poisonous trees, owning wild animals
Difference Between Contract and Tort
The main difference between a contract and a tort are as follows:
| BASIS FOR COMPARISON | TORT | CONTRACT |
| Meaning | An unfair act or omission that causes harm to another person or piece of property is called a tort. | A court of law has the authority to enforce the terms of the contract. |
| Liability | If any of the provisions of the agreement are broken, the parties are accountable. | Depending on whether there has been a legal responsibility broken towards others. |
| Duties | The law establishes obligations. | The contract’s parties decide what their responsibilities are. |
| Minors | It is possible to sue minors to recover damages. | Minors are only partially liable. |
| Rights and Obligations | It comes from the common law that the courts established. It depends on the situation. | It is the consequence of the parties’ existing agreement. |
| Compensation | Backwards-looking | Forward-looking |
| Duty | Owed to the general public | Owed to the specific people |
| Damages | Real, Exemplary, Unliquidated or Contemptuous. | Real and Liquidated |
| Period of Limitation | It is taken into account as of the date the damage occurs. | Considered from the date of breach of contract. |
| Consent | Committed without permission. | Based on the consent of contracting parties. |
| Law | Made by judges | Codified law |
| Lawsuit | A lawsuit may also be filed by a third party. | Unavoidably, only parties to a contract may bring legal action. |
| Remedy | Claim for unliquidated damages. | Claim for liquidated damages. |
| Privity | No privity exists. | Privity of the contract must be present. |
How are Tort Law and Contract Law Similar?
As was already mentioned, when comparing contract law to tort law, both are essentially subsets of civil law. They specify what constitutes a civil wrong, which can result in liability for harm done to third parties, destruction of their property, or harm to other interests. Liability for paying monetary damages to compensate the harmed party for their losses results from both contract and duty of care breaches.
As previously stated, whether the breach is explicit or implied, written or oral, it is considered a breach of contract under contract law. It happens when one party breaches a contract by not completing the agreed performance. A violation of one party’s duty of care to another is referred to as a breach of duty in tort law. For instance, claims based on negligence basis are the most prevalent kind of tort claims. For an injury claim based on negligence to be successful, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant violated a duty of care due to them and that the violation resulted in the plaintiff’s losses or injuries.
Alternatively, a person bringing a product liability claim needs to demonstrate that the product’s flaw caused their harm or damage to their property. Financial damages must be paid by the companies that produced and distributed the faulty goods.
The fundamental method of recovery in all three scenarios—negligence, strict liability, and breach of contract—is the payment of monetary damages to the harmed party.
Also Read: What is the Difference Between Contract and Agreement? Complete Details
FAQs
The essentials of a valid contract are:
Offer
Acceptance
Intent to create a legal relationship
Competence
Free Consent
Lawful Consideration
Lawful Object
Certainty of Meaning
Possibility of Performance
Agreement not expressly declared void
Writing and Registration
It is important to remember that the offer is made to form a legal partnership.
A written or verbal contract may be used. However, in certain situations, the agreement needs to be both registered and in writing.
RELATED POSTS
This was all about the “Difference between Contract and Tort”. For more such informative blogs, check out our Study Material Section, you can learn more about us by visiting our Indian exams page.