Q- Many people believe that countries should produce food for the whole population and import as little food as possible.To What Extent do you agree or disagree?
Ans. In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population. However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country can not stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.
Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential. For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries that can not be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade.
Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture. Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises.
In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalised world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.
Analysis
Paraphrased Statement: In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population.
Thesis Statement: However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country can not stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.
Body Paragraph 1-Topic Sentences: Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential.
Body Paragraph 1- Supporting Reasons and Explanations: For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries from foods that can not be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade.
Body Paragraph 2- Topic sentence: Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture.
Body Paragraph 2- Supporting Reasons and Explanations: Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises.
Conclusion: In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalized world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.
Vocabulary in Use
In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population. However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country can not stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.
Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential. For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries from foods that can not be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade.
Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture. Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises.
In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalized world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.
Linkers and Connectors Used
Following are the linkers and connectors used in the essay:
- In the contemporary world
- It allows
- However
- Because
- For example
- Furthermore
- Additionally
- Moreover
- In conclusion
Are you preparing for IELTS? Check out this video to improve your writing skills for the IELTS exam given below👇.
Download the Leverage IELTS App today.
Need help preparing for IELTS? Check out the best IELTS preparation courses in the market offered in a live training environment by trusted educators in a live training environment. If you want to help studying abroad, call 1800-572-000.