One app for all your study abroad needs
Q- Historical objects should be returned to their original country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Ans. The debate about the repatriation of historical objects to their countries of origin is a controversial one. While it is understandable that nations would want their cultural artifacts back, I strongly believe that these objects should remain in their current locations for several reasons.
The opportunity to highlight the global significance of objects is provided by keeping them in international museums.Firstly, museums and institutions that house historical objects possess the resources and expertise required to preserve and display them properly.These institutions, like the British Museum or the Louvre, attract millions of visitors every year providing an audience with the opportunity to appreciate these artifacts. If these objects were returned to their countries of origin they might not receive the level of care or exposure. Secondly, historical objects often go beyond boundaries by belonging to the shared heritage of humanity. Take the Rosetta Stone as an example – it played an important role in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs, a breakthrough that made a positive impact not only on Egypt but also on the entire world.
Lastly, returning artifacts could establish a dangerous precedent. If every artifact were to be sent back to its country of origin, museums would be left empty and the understanding of history could become fragmented in people. Besides, determining the original location of an object can be problematic due to centuries of conquests and migrations.For instance, contemplating a prehistoric artifact subjected to multiple displacements throughout history exemplifies the intricate difficulties associated with accurately discerning its precise origin. This complexity introduces formidable impediments to the formal repatriation process, creating substantial challenges in the endeavor to return such artifacts to their rightful places.
To conclude, although the emotional aspect of sending artifacts to their original countries is compelling, it is important to think about the wider consequences. Prioritising the preservation, accessibility, and admiration of these objects should be the primary goal which is often effectively accomplished by keeping them in their current locations.
Analysis
Paraphrased Statement: The debate about the repatriation of historical objects to their countries of origin is a controversial one.
Thesis Statement: While it is understandable that nations would want their cultural artifacts back, I strongly believe that these objects should remain in their current locations for several reasons.
Body Paragraph 1-Topic Sentences: The opportunity to highlight the global significance of objects is provided by keeping them in international museums. Firstly, museums and institutions that house historical objects possess the resources and expertise required to preserve and display them properly. These institutions, like the British Museum or the Louvre, attract millions of visitors every year providing an audience with the opportunity to appreciate these artifacts.
Body Paragraph 1- Supporting Reasons and Explanations: If these objects were returned to their countries of origin they might not receive the level of care or exposure. Secondly, historical objects often go beyond boundaries by belonging to the shared heritage of humanity. Take the Rosetta Stone as an example – it played an important role in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs, a breakthrough that made a positive impact not only on Egypt but also on the entire world.
Body Paragraph 2- Topic sentences: Lastly, returning artifacts could establish a dangerous precedent. If every artifact were to be sent back to its country of origin, museums would be left empty and the understanding of history could become fragmented in people. Besides, determining the original location of an object can be problematic due to centuries of conquests and migrations.
Body Paragraph 2- Supporting Reasons and Explanations: .For instance, contemplating a prehistoric artifact subjected to multiple displacements throughout history exemplifies the intricate difficulties associated with accurately discerning its precise origin. This complexity introduces formidable impediments to the formal repatriation process, creating substantial challenges in the endeavor to return such artifacts to their rightful places.
Conclusion: To conclude, although the emotional aspect of sending artifacts to their original countries is compelling, it is important to think about the wider consequences. Prioritising the preservation, accessibility, and admiration of these objects should be the primary goal which is often effectively accomplished by keeping them in their current locations.
Vocabulary in Use
The debate about the repatriation of historical objects to their countries of origin is a controversial one. While it is understandable that nations would want their cultural artifacts back, I strongly believe that these objects should remain in their current locations for several reasons.
The opportunity to highlight the global significance of objects is provided by keeping them in international museums.Firstly, museums and institutions that house historical objects possess the resources and expertise required to preserve and display them properly. These institutions, like the British Museum or the Louvre, attract millions of visitors every year providing an audience with the opportunity to appreciate these artifacts. If these objects were returned to their countries of origin they might not receive the level of care or exposure. Secondly, historical objects often go beyond boundaries by belonging to the shared heritage of humanity. Take the Rosetta Stone as an example – it played an important role in deciphering Egyptian hieroglyphs, a breakthrough that made a positive impact not only on Egypt but also on the entire world.
Lastly, returning artifacts could establish a dangerous precedent. If every artifact were to be sent back to its country of origin, museums would be left empty and the understanding of history could become fragmented in people. Besides, determining the original location of an object can be problematic due to centuries of conquests and migrations.For instance, contemplating a prehistoric artifact subjected to multiple displacements throughout history exemplifies the intricate difficulties associated with accurately discerning its precise origin. This complexity introduces formidable impediments to the formal repatriation process, creating substantial challenges in the endeavor to return such artifacts to their rightful places.
To conclude, although the emotional aspect of sending artifacts to their original countries is compelling, it is important to think about the wider consequences. Prioritising the preservation, accessibility, and admiration of these objects should be the primary goal which is often effectively accomplished by keeping them in their current locations.
Linkers and Connectors Used
The linkers and connectors used in the essay are as follows:
- While
- Firstly
- If
- Secondly
- Take … as an example
- Lastly
- Besides
- For instance
- To conclude
Are you preparing for IELTS? Check out this video to improve your writing skills for the IELTS exam given below👇.
Download the Leverage IELTS App today.
Need help preparing for IELTS? Check out the best IELTS preparation courses in the market offered in a live training environment by trusted educators in a live training environment. If you want to help studying abroad, call 1800-572-000.
25,000+ students realised their study abroad dream with us. Take the first step today.