One app for all your study abroad needs
The NCERT Class 11 Political Theory Chapter 8: Secularism examines the concept of secularism in the context of democratic societies with diverse religious communities. It explores how secularism addresses inter-religious and intra-religious domination, its relevance in India, and its differences from Western models. The chapter also addresses criticisms of Indian secularism, such as accusations of being anti-religious, a Western import, or promoting minoritism. These notes summarise key concepts, models of secularism, and critiques, providing a clear and concise resource for revision and exam preparation.
Table of Contents
Explore Notes of Class 11 Political Science
Introduction
This section introduces secularism as a doctrine to ensure equality among diverse religious communities in a democratic state, with a focus on its relevance and challenges in India.
Definition: Secularism is a normative doctrine that seeks to create a society free from inter-religious and intra-religious domination, promoting freedom within religions and equality between and within religions.
Characteristics:
- Secularism opposes all forms of religious domination, including discrimination based on religious identity and oppressive practices within religions.
- In India, secularism is a widely professed ideal in political discourse, yet it faces anxieties and challenges from religious nationalists, politicians, and academics.
- Examples of religious discrimination, such as the 1984 anti-Sikh riots, the displacement of Kashmiri Pandits, and the 2002 Gujarat riots, highlight the need for secularism to ensure freedom and dignity for all citizens.
- Secularism is not anti-religious; it recognises religion’s role in addressing human suffering (e.g., separation, loss) alongside art and philosophy.
- Globally, issues like discrimination against Arabs in Israel or non-Christians in Europe underscore secularism’s ongoing importance.
Significance: Secularism is crucial for democratic societies to prevent religious persecution, promote equality, and foster peaceful coexistence among diverse communities.
Example: The 1984 massacre of Sikhs in Delhi illustrates inter-religious domination, where a community was targeted due to its religious identity, emphasising the need for secularism.
Also Read:
- NCERT Class 11 Political Science Chapter 1 Political Theory Notes (Free PDF)
- NCERT Class 11 Political Science Chapter 2: Freedom Notes (Free PDF)
Inter-Religious and Intra-Religious Domination
This section explores the two primary forms of religious domination that secularism seeks to address: inter-religious and intra-religious domination.
Definition: Inter-religious domination involves discrimination or persecution of one religious community by another, while intra-religious domination refers to oppressive practices within a religion, such as gender or caste-based discrimination.
Characteristics:
- Inter-religious Domination: Occurs when members of one religious community are targeted due to their identity. Examples include the 1984 anti-Sikh riots (over 2,700 killed), the forced exodus of Kashmiri Pandits from the Kashmir valley, and the 2002 Gujarat riots (over 1,000 killed).
- Intra-religious Domination: Involves discriminatory practices within a religion, such as barring Dalits or women from Hindu temples, unequal treatment of women in Hinduism, Islam, or Christianity, or sectarian violence due to religious fundamentalism.
- Secularism opposes both forms of domination, promoting freedom within religions (e.g., right to dissent) and equality between religions (e.g., preventing majority oppression of minorities).
- Religion is not merely an “opium of the masses” but a response to human suffering; however, its organised forms often foster conservative practices that secularism challenges.
Significance: By addressing both inter- and intra-religious domination, secularism ensures a society where all individuals and communities can live with dignity and freedom.
Example: The exclusion of Dalits from Hindu temples reflects intra-religious domination, which secularism seeks to eliminate through state-supported reforms like banning untouchability.
Secular State
This section discusses the characteristics of a secular state and the necessity of separating state and religious institutions to prevent domination.
Definition: A secular state is one that is neither theocratic nor formally allied with any religion, committed to promoting peace, religious freedom, and equality through separation from organised religion.
Characteristics:
- A secular state must not be run by religious heads (theocracy), as seen in medieval Papal states or the Taliban-controlled state, which oppress dissenting groups.
- Separation of state and religion is necessary but not sufficient; states with established religions (e.g., the Anglican Church in 16th-century England, Sunni Islam in Pakistan) may still discriminate.
- A secular state derives its principles partly from non-religious sources, prioritising values like peace, freedom from religious oppression, and inter- and intra-religious equality.
- The form of separation varies depending on the values promoted; it may involve disengagement or engagement with religion to achieve equality.
- Education and individual acts of mutual help can reduce prejudice, but state intervention is critical to eliminate religious discrimination due to its public power.
Significance: A secular state is essential to prevent religious conflict, ensure equality, and create a society free from religious domination.
Example: Pakistan’s official state religion (Sunni Islam) limits religious equality, contrasting with a truly secular state that avoids formal religious alliances.
Western Model of Secularism
This section examines the mainstream Western model of secularism, particularly the American approach, and its focus on the mutual exclusion of state and religion.
Definition: The Western model of secularism, best represented by the United States, emphasises a strict separation of state and religion, where neither interferes in the other’s affairs.
Characteristics:
- The state cannot base policies on religious rationale or classify citizens by religion, ensuring no religious intrusion into governance.
- The state cannot aid religious institutions (e.g., funding religious schools) or interfere in religious practices, even discriminatory ones (e.g., barring women from the priesthood), as religion is a private matter.
- Freedom and equality are interpreted individualistically, prioritising individual liberty over community-based rights or minority rights.
- This model arose in religiously homogeneous Western societies (except for Jewish minorities), focusing on intra-religious domination (e.g., church control) rather than inter-religious equality.
- It does not support state-driven religious reform, maintaining a strict boundary between state and religion.
Significance: The Western model ensures individual religious freedom but may neglect minority rights or inter-religious equality due to its focus on mutual exclusion.
Example: In the U.S., the state cannot intervene if a religious institution excommunicates dissenters, as religion is considered a private domain.
Indian Model of Secularism
This section highlights the distinctive features of Indian secularism, shaped by India’s religious diversity and interaction with Western ideas.
Definition: Indian secularism is a unique model that emphasises both inter-religious and intra-religious equality, allowing state engagement with religion to promote freedom and reform, unlike the Western model’s mutual exclusion.
Characteristics:
- Indian secularism arose in a context of deep religious diversity, building on a pre-existing culture of inter-religious tolerance, sharpened by Western ideas of equality.
- It opposes both inter-religious domination (e.g., majority oppression of minorities) and intra-religious domination (e.g., caste or gender discrimination within religions).
- Unlike the Western model, it grants religious minorities the right to maintain their culture and educational institutions, alongside individual religious freedom.
- The Indian state supports religious reform, banning practices like untouchability and child marriage, and enacting laws to promote inter-caste marriage.
- The state adopts a “principled distance,” engaging with religion positively (e.g., aiding minority institutions) or negatively (e.g., banning oppressive practices) to ensure equality.
- Indian secularism is not merely “equal respect for all religions” but allows principled intervention in religions to eliminate unacceptable practices (e.g., caste hierarchies).
Significance: Indian secularism’s flexibility and focus on equality make it suitable for a diverse society, addressing both individual and community rights.
Example: The Indian Constitution’s ban on untouchability reflects state-supported reform to address intra-religious domination within Hinduism.
Also Read:
- NCERT Class 11 Political Science Political Theory: Chapter 2 Freedom Solutions (Free PDF)
- NCERT Class 11 Political Science Chapter 3: Equality Notes (Free PDF)
Criticisms of Indian Secularism
This section discusses common criticisms of Indian secularism and provides defences against them.
Definition: Indian secularism faces criticisms such as being anti-religious, a Western import, promoting minoritism, being overly interventionist, encouraging vote bank politics, and being an impossible project.
Characteristics:
- Anti-religious: Critics claim secularism is anti-religious, but it opposes institutionalised religious domination, not religion itself, promoting religious freedom and equality.
- Western Import: Some argue secularism is unsuited to India as a Western concept, but it has both Western (church-state separation) and Indian (peaceful coexistence) origins, tailored to India’s diversity.
- Minoritism: Critics accuse secularism of favouring minorities, but minority rights protect fundamental interests (e.g., cultural preservation), akin to providing accessibility for the disabled, not special privileges.
- Interventionist: Some view secularism as coercive, but its “principled distance” allows non-coercive engagement, supporting liberal reforms within religions.
- Vote Bank Politics: Secularism is blamed for encouraging vote bank politics, but this is a democratic issue, not a flaw of secularism; it becomes problematic when it prioritises short-term gains over long-term welfare or exacerbates divisions.
- Impossible Project: Critics claim secularism cannot achieve peaceful coexistence, but India’s history and the Ottoman Empire show it is possible; Indian secularism reflects the future of diverse global societies.
Significance: Addressing these criticisms clarifies secularism’s role in promoting equality and freedom, countering misconceptions about its intent and impact.
Example: The charge of minoritism is countered by comparing minority rights to providing a ramp for wheelchair users, ensuring equal access, not special treatment.
Conclusion
This section summarises the importance of secularism in addressing religious diversity and ensuring equality in democratic societies.
Characteristics:
- Secularism opposes inter- and intra-religious domination, promoting peace, freedom, and equality.
- The Indian model, distinct from the Western model, balances individual and community rights, supporting religious reform and minority protections.
- Criticisms like anti-religiosity or minoritism are addressed by emphasising secularism’s focus on equality and its adaptation to India’s diverse context.
- Indian secularism is a global model for diverse societies, as seen in Europe and America, which are becoming more religiously diverse due to migration and globalisation.
Significance: Secularism is vital for democratic societies to ensure dignity and freedom for all, with India’s experiment offering lessons for global coexistence.
Example: India’s support for minority educational institutions reflects its commitment to inter-religious equality, distinct from the Western model’s non-intervention.
Discussion Questions
This section highlights key discussion points to deepen understanding of secularism’s role in diverse societies.
Questions and Insights:
- Secularism’s Relevance: Why is secularism crucial in societies with religious diversity? It prevents domination and ensures equality, as seen in India’s response to riots and discrimination.
- Indian vs. Western Secularism: How does Indian secularism differ from the Western model? Indian secularism emphasises community rights and state-supported reform, unlike the West’s focus on individual liberty.
- Minority Rights: Are minority rights justified, or do they create special privileges? They protect fundamental interests, ensuring equality, not favouritism.
- Vote Bank Politics: How does vote bank politics affect secularism’s goals? It can distort equality by prioritising electoral gains over long-term welfare, exacerbating divisions.
Significance: These questions encourage critical analysis of secularism’s principles, challenges, and relevance in democratic governance.
Example: The debate over minority rights reflects tensions between equality and perceived favouritism, clarified by the analogy of accessibility accommodations.
Important Definitions in NCERT Class 11 Political Theory Chapter 8: Secularism Notes
This section lists key terms from Chapter 8: Secularism for clarity and revision. Look at the key terms to understand this chapter in more detail.
- Secularism: A normative doctrine that promotes a society free from inter-religious and intra-religious domination, ensuring freedom within religions and equality between and within religions.
- Inter-religious Domination: Discrimination or persecution of one religious community by another, e.g., targeting Sikhs in the 1984 riots.
- Intra-religious Domination: Oppressive practices within a religion, e.g., barring Dalits from Hindu temples or gender inequality in religious practices.
- Secular State: A state that is neither theocratic nor allied with any religion, committed to peace, religious freedom, and equality through separation from organised religion.
- Western Secularism: A model emphasising mutual exclusion of state and religion, focusing on individual liberty and non-intervention in religious affairs.
- Indian Secularism: A model that promotes inter- and intra-religious equality, allowing state engagement with religion for reform and minority protections, guided by principled distance.
- Principled Distance: A policy where the state maintains distance from religion but engages positively or negatively to promote equality and reform.
- Vote Bank Politics: The mobilisation of a social group to vote en masse for a candidate or party, often prioritising short-term electoral gains over long-term welfare.
Explore Notes of Class 11 Political Science: Political Theory
Download the Solutions of Other Chapters of Class 11 Political Science: Political Theory
Related Reads
Explore Notes of Other Subjects of NCERT Class 11
FAQs
Indian secularism emphasises inter- and intra-religious equality, supports minority rights, and allows state engagement for reform, while Western secularism focuses on mutual exclusion of state and religion, prioritising individual liberty.
No, Indian secularism opposes institutionalised religious domination, not religion itself, promoting religious freedom and equality.
Minority rights protect fundamental interests, ensuring equality for all communities, similar to providing accessibility for the disabled, not granting special privileges.
For NCERT study material, follow NCERT Notes and Solutions Class 11 Political Science by Leverage Edu now.
