One app for all your study abroad needs
The NCERT Class 11 Sociology Chapter 2: Social Change and Social Order in Rural and Urban Society from Understanding Society, explores the dynamics of social change and the process that maintain social order in rural and urban contexts. It examines the causes, types, and impacts of social change, along with the structures that ensure stability. This blog provides detailed solutions to the chapter’s exercise questions, simplifying complex sociological concepts for better understanding.
Exercise
- Would you agree with the statement that rapid social change is a comparatively new phenomenon in human history? Give reasons for your answer.
- How is social change to be distinguished from other kinds of change?
- What do you understand by ‘structural change’? Explain with examples other than those in the text.
- Describe some kinds of environment-related social change.
- What are some kinds of changes brought about by technology and the economy?
- What is meant by social order, and how is it maintained?
- What is authority, and how is it related to domination and the law?
- How are a village, a town, and a city distinguished from each other?
- What are some features of social order in rural areas?
- What are some of the challenges to social order in urban areas?
Solutions
1. Yes, I agree that rapid social change is a comparatively new phenomenon in human history. According to the chapter, human beings have existed for approximately 500,000 years, but a civilised existence spans only about 6,000 years. Significant and rapid social change has occurred primarily in the last 400 years, with the pace accelerating in the last 100 years, particularly in the last 50 years, and even more so in the last 20 years. This suggests that rapid change is a recent development relative to the long span of human history. The reasons include technological advancements, such as the Industrial Revolution driven by the steam engine, which transformed economies and social structures in a short period. Additionally, political changes like the establishment of universal adult franchise and cultural shifts, such as evolving ideas about childhood, have contributed to rapid transformations. These changes contrast with earlier periods when societies were more stable, and change was slow, as seen in pre-industrial societies with minimal technological or economic shifts. Thus, the acceleration of change, driven by modern developments, marks rapid social change as a new phenomenon.
2. Social change is distinguished from other kinds of change by its significance, scale, and impact on the underlying structure of society. Unlike minor or superficial changes, social change involves alterations that are both intensive (profound in impact) and extensive (affecting large sections of society). As defined in the chapter, social change refers to significant changes that alter the “underlying structure of an object or situation over a period of time.” For example, economic changes like fluctuations in market prices or political changes like a new policy may not qualify as social change unless they fundamentally transform societal structures or norms.
Social change is further classified by its causes (e.g., environmental, technological), Social change is thus distinguished by its transformative effect on institutions, norms, or values, such as the shift from child labour to compulsory education, which reshaped societal views on childhood. In contrast, other changes, like daily weather variations or individual lifestyle adjustments, lack the scale or structural impact to be considered social change.
3. Structural change refers to transformations in the organisation, institutions, or rules governing society, fundamentally altering how social systems function. As per the chapter, it involves changes in the structure of society, such as shifts in institutional frameworks or operational norms. Unlike changes in values or beliefs, structural changes reshape the foundational arrangements of social, economic, or political systems.
Examples:
- Introduction of Universal Adult Franchise in India: Post-independence, India adopted universal adult franchise, granting voting rights to all adults regardless of caste, class, or gender. This structural change transformed the political system by redistributing power, empowering marginalised groups, and altering the dynamics of governance, unlike earlier systems where only elites could vote.
- Abolition of Zamindari System: The land reforms in India after independence abolished the zamindari system, transferring land ownership from absentee landlords to cultivators. This structural change altered rural economic and social hierarchies, empowering intermediate castes and reshaping agrarian relations.
These examples illustrate how structural changes modify the rules or institutions that define societal organisation.
4. Environment-related social change occurs when natural or ecological factors significantly alter societal structures or lifestyles. The chapter highlights both destructive and constructive environmental impacts:
- Natural Disasters: Catastrophic events like earthquakes, floods, or tsunamis can cause irreversible social change. For instance, the 2004 tsunami in Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and parts of Tamil Nadu destroyed livelihoods and altered the social structure of coastal villages, forcing survivors to relocate or adopt new occupations, permanently changing community dynamics.
- Resource Discoveries: The discovery of valuable resources, such as oil in West Asia, transforms societies. Countries like Saudi Arabia and Kuwait saw rapid urbanisation, economic growth, and shifts in social hierarchies due to oil wealth, changing from nomadic or agrarian societies to modern, affluent ones.
- Climatic Influence: Historically, environmental conditions shaped societal organisation. For example, societies in desert regions could not practice settled agriculture, leading to nomadic lifestyles, distinct social interactions, and economic practices compared to river valley societies. While technology has reduced such influences, environmental factors still drive change when resources or disasters disrupt existing structures.
These examples show how environmental factors, whether sudden or gradual, reshape societal organisation and practices.
5. Technological and economic changes have profound impacts on society, often interlinked, as they reshape production, social relations, and cultural norms. The chapter provides several instances:
- Industrial Revolution and Steam Power: The steam engine enabled large-scale industry and reliable transport (railways, steamships), transforming economies and social geography. In India, railways introduced in 1853 reshaped trade and migration patterns, fostering urban growth and economic integration.
- Textile Industry Innovations: In Britain, new spinning and weaving machines, combined with market forces, destroyed India’s handloom industry, which was previously the world’s largest. This economic shift led to deindustrialisation in India, altering artisans’ livelihoods and social status.
- Plantation Agriculture: Economic shifts like the rise of plantation agriculture (e.g., tea in Assam) created labour demands, leading to forced migration of workers from eastern India. This changed demographic patterns and social structures in plantation regions, embedding inequalities.
- Global Trade Policies: Changes in customs duties or tariffs, influenced by institutions like the World Trade Organisation, can wipe out industries or create economic booms, affecting employment and social hierarchies. For example, reduced tariffs may lead to job losses in local industries, reshaping urban economies.
These changes illustrate how technology and economic forces drive structural, demographic, and cultural transformations in society.
6. Social order refers to the active maintenance and reproduction of social relations, norms, and values that ensure societal stability and predictability. It resists or regulates change to sustain a viable social system, as per the chapter. Social order is maintained through two primary methods:
- Spontaneous Consent: Individuals internalise norms through socialisation, leading them to voluntarily follow rules. For example, people adhere to family traditions or caste norms because they are socialised to view them as right, fostering cooperation without coercion.
- Coercion and Power: When consent is insufficient, power or domination enforces compliance. Dominant groups, benefiting from stratification (e.g., wealthy landlords), use their control over resources to maintain order. For instance, in villages, the poor depend on dominant castes for employment, limiting dissent. Authority, or legitimate power (e.g., a judge’s rulings), and laws (e.g., traffic regulations) codify norms, ensuring predictable behaviour. Sanctions, such as legal penalties or social ostracism, reinforce compliance.
Social order is thus a balance of voluntary adherence and enforced compliance, with dominant groups resisting change to preserve their status, while laws and authority provide institutional support
7. Authority is legitimate power, considered justified and proper within a society, as defined by Max Weber in the chapter. It elicits consent and cooperation, unlike raw power, which may lack acceptance. Authority relates to domination and the law as follows:
- Relation to Domination: Domination occurs when power is stable and habitual, with one group routinely exercising control over others. Authority is a form of domination that is legitimised, meaning it is accepted as just. For example, a police officer’s authority to regulate public behaviour is accepted because it aligns with societal norms, unlike a gang leader’s coercive domination, which may lack legitimacy.
- Relation to the Law: Authority is often codified in law, which consists of explicitly written norms binding all citizens. Laws formalise authority, specifying its scope and limits. For instance, a judge’s authority is defined by legal statutes, applicable only in the courtroom, while a teacher’s authority over students is partly formalised by school rules. Laws ensure that authority operates within a legitimate framework, reinforcing social order. However, authority can also be informal (e.g., a religious leader’s influence), though less strictly tied to law.
Thus, authority transforms domination into socially accepted power, often backed by law, ensuring smooth enforcement of norms.
8. Villages, towns, and cities are distinguished based on economic, administrative, and sociological criteria, primarily population density and economic activities, as outlined in the chapter:
- Village: A village is a small settlement with low population density, spread over a larger area, and a significant proportion of its economy tied to agriculture. Sociologically, villages emerged with settled agriculture, enabling surplus production and social differentiation. They feature personalised relationships and traditional institutions like caste. For example, a village may have farmers engaged in crop cultivation, with most income from agriculture.
- Town: A town is an urban settlement with a higher population density than a village and a more diverse economic profile, including trade, services, or small-scale industries. Towns are distinguished from villages by a lower share of agricultural activities. Administratively, towns are defined by local governance structures, and their size may overlap with large villages, making population alone insufficient for distinction.
- City: A city is a larger urban settlement with very high population density and a complex economy, including commerce, industry, and services, with minimal agricultural activity. Cities are administrative hubs, often part of urban agglomerations (including suburbs) or metropolitan areas (multiple cities). For example, Delhi is a metropolitan area with diverse economic activities and dense populations. Sociologically, cities foster individuality and modernity but also intensify group identities (e.g., caste, class).
The chapter notes that size alone is not decisive; economic activities and density are key differentiators, with villages being agriculture-focused, and towns and cities progressively more urban and diverse.
9. Social order in rural areas is characterised by strong, traditional structures that resist change and maintain stability, shaped by the unique conditions of village life. Key features, as per the chapter, include:
- Personalised Relationships: Due to small population sizes, villagers often know each other, fostering close-knit interactions. This lack of anonymity strengthens social control, as individuals are easily identified, discouraging dissent.
- Traditional Institutions: Institutions like caste, religion, and customary practices dominate rural social order. For example, caste hierarchies dictate social roles and economic relations, with dominant castes controlling resources and enforcing norms.
- Dominance of Powerful Groups: Dominant castes or landowning groups hold significant power, controlling employment and resources. This limits the ability of subordinate groups, subordinate groups to challenge social order, as they depend on the dominant for survival, making dissent risky.
- Resilient Social Order: The combination of traditional norms and economic dependency makes rural social order resilient, slowing change. For instance, land reforms empowered dominant castes, reinforcing their control over rural politics and economy.
- Limited Scope for Dissent: The lack of alternative employment or support, combined with close community ties, makes it difficult for lower groups to organise or protest, as the powerful can easily suppress such efforts.
These features create a stable but unequal social order, where change, such as shifts in power, is slow to occur.
10. Social order in urban areas faces significant challenges due to high population density, diverse populations, and spatial constraints, as discussed in the chapter. Key challenges include:
- Space Management: High density creates logistical issues, such as housing shortages, leading to homelessness and slums. Slums, lacking proper civic facilities (e.g., sanitation, water), foster informal power structures, like “dadas,” who impose authority, undermining formal governance.
- Social Tensions and Inequalities: Urban areas intensify group identities (e.g., caste, class, religion), leading to conflicts that challenge social order. For example, class-based segregation, seen in gated communities, creates disparities in access to resources, fueling resentment.
- Transport and Congestion: The separation of residential and commercial areas necessitates complex mass transit systems. Reliance on private vehicles causes traffic congestion and pollution, disrupting daily life and reducing quality of life, which can lead to public discontent.
- Urban Governance: Managing housing, public health, sanitation, and policing in dense populations is a formidable task. Failures in these areas, such as inadequate sanitation in slums, erode trust in authorities, weakening social order.
- Crime and Informal Power: The absence of settled property rights in slums enables extra-legal activities, including criminal gangs and real estate mafias, which challenge state authority and formal law enforcement.
These challenges, rooted in spatial and social complexities, make maintaining social order in urban areas a dynamic and ongoing struggle, requiring robust planning and governance.
Related Reads
For more topics, follow LeverageEdu NCERT Study Material today!
