Some Feel That Individuals Should Have the Right To Strike in All Jobs While Others Feel There Are Exceptions: IELTS Essay Topic

The right to strike is a contentious issue in the workplace. While some believe that employees should have the right to strike in all jobs, others argue that there should be exceptions. In this essay, I will explore both sides of the debate before presenting my own opinion on how both sides of the argument have valid points.

On the one hand, those who support the right to strike in all jobs argue that it is an essential tool for workers to negotiate better pay and working conditions. They argue that without the ability to strike, employees would have little leverage in negotiations with their employers. Furthermore, they suggest that strikes can help to draw attention to systemic issues and can lead to important reforms. Therefore, supporters of the right to strike believe that it is a fundamental human right that should be protected in all industries.

On the other hand, opponents of the right to strike suggest that there should be exceptions in certain industries. For example, they argue that essential services such as healthcare, emergency services, and public transportation should not be subject to strikes because they directly impact the health and safety of citizens. Furthermore, opponents argue that strikes can be detrimental to the economy, causing disruptions and financial losses to companies and the wider community.

In my opinion, both sides of the argument have valid points. While the right to strike is an important tool for employees to negotiate better pay and working conditions, it is also important to recognize that there are certain industries where strikes can have significant negative consequences. Therefore, I believe that there should be exceptions to the right to strike in certain industries, particularly in those that provide essential services. However, the decision to restrict the right to strike should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances and potential consequences.

In conclusion, the right to strike is a complex issue, with arguments on both sides. While employees should have the right to strike in most jobs, there are certain exceptions where the impact of strikes can have significant negative consequences. Therefore, I believe that there should be exceptions to the right to strike in certain industries, but that these exceptions should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances and potential consequences.

Outline statement:
The right to strike is a contentious issue in the workplace. 

Paraphrased statement:
While some believe that employees should have the right to strike in all jobs, others argue that there should be exceptions.

Thesis statement:
In this essay, I will explore both sides of the debate before presenting my own opinion on how both sides of the argument have valid points.

Body paragraph 1-Topic sentence:
On the one hand, those who support the right to strike in all jobs argue that it is an essential tool for workers to negotiate better pay and working conditions. 

Body paragraph 1- Supporting evidence:
hey argue that without the ability to strike, employees would have little leverage in negotiations with their employers.

Body paragraph 1- Analysis:
Furthermore, they suggest that strikes can help to draw attention to systemic issues and can lead to important reforms. Therefore, supporters of the right to strike believe that it is a fundamental human right that should be protected in all industries.

Body paragraph 2- Topic sentence:
On the other hand, opponents of the right to strike suggest that there should be exceptions in certain industries.

Body paragraph 2- Supporting evidence:
For example, they argue that essential services such as healthcare, emergency services, and public transportation should not be subject to strikes because they directly impact the health and safety of citizens.

Body paragraph 2- Analysis:
Furthermore, opponents argue that strikes can be detrimental to the economy, causing disruptions and financial losses to companies and the wider community.

Body paragraph 3- Topic sentence:
In my opinion, both sides of the argument have valid points. 

Body paragraph 3- Supporting evidence:
While the right to strike is an important tool for employees to negotiate better pay and working conditions, it is also important to recognize that there are certain industries where strikes can have significant negative consequences. 

Body paragraph 3- Analysis:
Therefore, I believe that there should be exceptions to the right to strike in certain industries, particularly in those that provide essential services. However, the decision to restrict the right to strike should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances and potential consequences.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the right to strike is a complex issue, with arguments on both sides. While employees should have the right to strike in most jobs, there are certain exceptions where the impact of strikes can have significant negative consequences. Therefore, I believe that there should be exceptions to the right to strike in certain industries, but that these exceptions should be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances and potential consequences.