IELTS Daily Essay Topic: Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

Q- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 

Ans. The discussion that governments must spend more money on railways rather than roads is a complex one. While railways do have certain advantages, I feel that roads should be given more priority because of several reasons. 

Roads serve as the backbone of any nation’s transportation system by helping them interconnect cities, towns, and remote areas to ensure accessibility. On the other hand, railways have limited reach and mostly cater to urban and semi-urban regions. Take India as an example where a significant amount of the population resides in rural areas where roads are vital, for commuting, transporting goods, and accessing essential services like healthcare and education.In addition to this, roads accommodate a range of vehicles ranging from bicycles and cars to buses and trucks. This versatility is not replicated by railways that primarily focus on long-distance travel and bulk transportation of goods. Therefore, roads play a crucial role in both city and inter-city transportation. 

Finally, the construction and upkeep of roads typically demand lower costs and shorter timeframes in comparison to the development of railways. This inherent efficiency in road infrastructure allows governments to establish and maintain a more expansive network with the same financial resources. The flexibility and adaptability of road systems contribute to their cost-effectiveness, enabling quicker implementation of projects and more immediate responses to changing transportation needs. This advantage becomes particularly crucial in regions where swift infrastructure development is essential for economic growth and accessibility.

In conclusion, while railways hold importance in a country’s infrastructure and overall development, the advantages and adaptability of roads make them more deserving recipients of government funding. Hence, I respectfully disagree with the notion that governments should prioritise spending on railways over roads.

Analysis

Paraphrased Statement: The discussion that governments must spend more money on railways rather than roads is a complex one.

Thesis Statement:  While railways do have certain advantages, I feel that roads should be given more priority because of several reasons. 

Body Paragraph 1-Topic Sentences: Roads serve as the backbone of any nation’s transportation system by helping them interconnect cities, towns, and remote areas to ensure accessibility. On the other hand, railways have limited reach and mostly cater to urban and semi-urban regions. 

Body Paragraph 1- Supporting Reasons and Explanations:  Take India as an example where a significant amount of the population resides in rural areas where roads are vital, for commuting, transporting goods, and accessing essential services like healthcare and education.In addition to this, roads accommodate a range of vehicles ranging from bicycles and cars to buses and trucks. This versatility is not replicated by railways that primarily focus on long-distance travel and bulk transportation of goods. Therefore, roads play a crucial role in both city and inter-city transportation. 

Body Paragraph 2- Topic sentences: Finally, the construction and upkeep of roads typically demand lower costs and shorter timeframes in comparison to the development of railways. This inherent efficiency in road infrastructure allows governments to establish and maintain a more expansive network with the same financial resources. 

Body Paragraph 2- Supporting Reasons and Explanations: The flexibility and adaptability of road systems contribute to their cost-effectiveness, enabling quicker implementation of projects and more immediate responses to changing transportation needs. This advantage becomes particularly crucial in regions where swift infrastructure development is essential for economic growth and accessibility.
Conclusion: In conclusion, while railways hold importance in a country’s infrastructure and overall development, the advantages and adaptability of roads make them more deserving recipients of government funding. Hence, I respectfully disagree with the notion that governments should prioritise spending on railways over roads.

Vocabulary in Use

The discussion that governments must spend more money on railways rather than roads is a complex one. While railways do have certain advantages, I feel that roads should be given more priority because of several reasons. 

Roads serve as the backbone of any nation’s transportation system by helping them interconnect cities, towns, and remote areas to ensure accessibility. On the other hand, railways have limited reach and mostly cater to urban and semi-urban regions. Take India as an example where a significant amount of the population resides in rural areas where roads are vital, for commuting, transporting goods, and accessing essential services like healthcare and education. In addition to this, roads accommodate a range of vehicles ranging from bicycles and cars to buses and trucks. This versatility is not replicated by railways that primarily focus on long-distance travel and bulk transportation of goods. Therefore, roads play a crucial role in both city and inter-city transportation. 

Finally, the construction and upkeep of roads typically demand lower costs and shorter timeframes in comparison to the development of railways. This inherent efficiency in road infrastructure allows governments to establish and maintain a more expansive network with the same financial resources. The flexibility and adaptability of road systems contribute to their cost-effectiveness, enabling quicker implementation of projects and more immediate responses to changing transportation needs. This advantage becomes particularly crucial in regions where swift infrastructure development is essential for economic growth and accessibility.

In conclusion, while railways hold importance in a country’s infrastructure and overall development, the advantages and adaptability of roads make them more deserving recipients of government funding. Hence, I respectfully disagree with the notion that governments should prioritise spending on railways over roads.

Linkers and Connectors Used

The linkers and connectors used in the essay are as follows:

1. The discussion that
2. While
3. I feel that
4. Because of
5. Serve as
6. By helping
7. On the other hand
8. Take…as an example
9. Where
10. For
11. In addition to this
12. Ranging from…to
13. This versatility is not replicated by
14. Therefore
15. Finally
16. in comparison to
17. Allows
18. With the same
19. Contribute to
20. Enabling
21. This advantage becomes
22. In conclusion
23. Make them more deserving
24. Hence
25. I respectfully disagree with

Are you preparing for IELTS? Check out this video to improve your writing skills for the IELTS exam given below👇.

Related Blogs
IELTS Eligibility: IELTS Exam Age Limit & Qualification	IELTS Exam 2023 Dates, Registration, Result, Preparation	IELTS Sample Tests: PDF (Download), Exam Pattern
IELTS Marking Scheme | IELTS Scoring System & Grading	IELTS Test Centres in India	IELTS Syllabus 2023 & Section-Wise Exam Pattern

Download the Leverage IELTS App today.

Need help preparing for IELTS? Check out the best IELTS preparation courses in the market offered in a live training environment by trusted educators in a live training environment. If you want to help studying abroad, call 1800-572-000.