One app for all your study abroad needs
Sociology employs systematic methods to study social phenomena scientifically. NCERT Class 11 Sociology Chapter 5, Doing Sociology: Research Methods, from Introducing Sociology, explores how sociologists gather knowledge through methods like surveys, interviews, and participant observation. This blog provides detailed solutions to the chapter’s exercise questions, simplifying complex ideas for better understanding.
Explore Notes of Class 11: Introducing Sociology
Exercise
- Why is the question of a scientific method particularly important in sociology?
- What are some of the reasons for ‘objectivity’ being more complicated in social sciences, particularly disciplines like sociology?
- How do sociologists try to deal with difficulties in “objectivity” and strive for objectivity?
- What is meant by ‘reflexivity’ and why is it important in sociology?
- What are some of the things that ethnographers and sociologists do during participant observation?
- What are the strengths and weaknesses of participant observation as a method?
- What are the basic elements of the survey method? What is the chief advantage of this method?
- Describe some of the criteria involved in selecting a representative sample.
- State some of the weaknesses of the survey method.
- Describe the main features of the interview as a research method.
Solutions
1. The question of a scientific method is particularly important in sociology because it establishes sociology as a social science, distinguishing it from everyday knowledge or common sense. Sociology studies familiar social phenomena—groups, institutions, norms, and relationships—that everyone experiences, but unlike laypersons who rely on personal observations, sociologists use systematic, scientific methods to gather empirical data. These methods, such as surveys, interviews, and participant observation, ensure rigorous, evidence-based knowledge production. For example, when studying bargaining in markets, sociologists examine both observable actions and insider perspectives (e.g., how shopkeepers and customers interpret their interactions), requiring structured procedures. Scientific methods enable sociologists to capture lived experiences, like the meanings of religious rituals or friendship across cultures, with objectivity, setting them apart from non-scientific approaches. This methodological rigour is crucial for sociology to produce reliable, unbiased insights into complex social dynamics.
2. Objectivity, producing unbiased, fact-based knowledge, is more complicated in sociology due to several reasons. First, sociologists are part of the social world they study, unlike natural scientists studying rocks or plants.
This insider position introduces bias from their social identities (e.g., family background, caste, gender), which can influence their interpretations. For example, a sociologist studying a different caste community may carry societal prejudices.
Second, the social world features multiple truths, with different groups holding competing perspectives (e.g., a shopkeeper and customer’s differing views on a “good” price), making it hard to identify a single “correct” truth.
Third, sociology is multi-paradigmatic, with conflicting schools of thought coexisting, complicating consensus on objective findings.
Finally, studying self-aware humans, who reflect on their actions, differs from studying inanimate objects, as human responses can vary based on context or researcher interaction. These factors make objectivity an ongoing challenge in sociology, requiring continuous efforts to mitigate bias and acknowledge diverse perspectives.
3. Sociologists address difficulties in objectivity through several strategies to minimise bias and produce reliable knowledge. First, they practice reflexivity, rigorously examining their own attitudes and adopting the perspectives of research subjects to reduce personal bias. For example, a sociologist studying rural poverty reflects on their urban background to avoid skewed interpretations.
Second, they ensure transparency by carefully documenting all research procedures and citing sources, allowing others to retrace their steps and verify findings. Third, sociologists acknowledge their social background in research reports, alerting readers to potential biases (e.g., a middle-class researcher studying a slum community). Fourth, they recognise multiple truths in the social world, avoiding judgments about which perspective is correct and focusing on understanding diverse viewpoints, such as differing notions of a “good” price. Finally, sociology views objectivity as an ongoing process, not an achieved state, encouraging continuous self-examination. These practices enhance the credibility of sociological research despite objectivity’s challenges.
4. Reflexivity refers to the sociologist’s practice of continuously examining their own ideas, feelings, and social background to identify and mitigate biases that might influence their research. It involves adopting an outsider’s perspective on their own work, seeing themselves through the eyes of others, particularly research subjects. For example, a sociologist studying a different religious community reflects on societal attitudes that might shape their analysis. Reflexivity is important in sociology because sociologists are part of the social world they study, making objectivity challenging. Their personal experiences (e.g., as a family member) or social identities (e.g., caste, gender) can unconsciously bias their interpretations. By practising reflexivity, sociologists ensure greater transparency and credibility in their findings. It also helps them understand the insider perspectives of the communities they study, aligning with sociology’s goal of capturing lived experiences. Reflexivity thus strengthens research by addressing bias, making it a critical tool in producing reliable sociological knowledge.
5. During participant observation, ethnographers and sociologists immerse themselves in a community for an extended period (often a year or more) to learn its culture and way of life. They undertake several activities:
- Live Among the Community: They reside with the group, participating in daily life to become an “insider,” learning the language and customs.
- Conduct a Census: They compile a detailed list of community members, noting sex, age, and family details.
- Map the Community: They create a physical layout of the settlement, marking houses and socially significant sites.
- Construct Genealogies: They trace family trees across generations, cross-checking with relatives to understand kinship roles (e.g., asking about parents, grandparents).
- Observe and Record: They observe daily activities, festivals, and rituals, maintaining detailed field notes or diaries daily to document significant aspects like family relations or modes of earning a living.
- Engage with Informants: They rely on key informants, who act as teachers, providing crucial information about community practices.
- Ask Questions: Like curious children, they ask endless questions about taken-for-granted practices to uncover implicit knowledge.
For example, an ethnographer in a village might participate in a festival, note kinship interactions, and consult informants to understand its significance, ensuring a holistic understanding of the community.
6. Strengths: Participant observation, involving long-term immersion in a community, offers unique advantages. It provides a rich, insider perspective, capturing the “whole way of life” through participation in daily activities, unlike surveys that rely on brief visits. For example, living in a village reveals caste dynamics during festivals. It allows correction of initial biases through prolonged engagement, tracks changes (e.g., behaviour in good vs. bad harvest years), and uncovers contextual nuances missed by other methods. By learning the community’s language and customs, the researcher gains deep insights, akin to a child’s holistic learning.
Weaknesses: Despite its strengths, participant observation has limitations. It is time-intensive, requiring a single researcher to spend months or years in one community, restricting coverage to a small group (e.g., one village), which limits generalizability. There’s a risk of bias, as the researcher’s perspective may dominate, with no alternative accounts to verify (e.g., selecting what to note). The one-sided relationship, where the researcher controls questions and presentation, marginalises respondents’ voices. For example, a study of one village’s kinship system may not reflect regional patterns. Dialogic formats (e.g., community feedback) are suggested, but increase complexity. Thus, while participant observation excels in depth, its scope and objectivity are constrained.
7. The basic elements of the survey method include:
- Sample Selection: Choosing a representative sample from the population using stratification (including relevant sub-groups, e.g., rural/urban) and randomisation (chance-based selection, e.g., random number tables) to ensure representativeness.
- Questionnaire Design: Creating a structured questionnaire (or survey instrument) with pre-set questions to collect standardised data, administered orally, in writing, or electronically.
- Data Collection: Conducted by teams of researchers and investigators who ask questions and record responses, often through personal visits, telephone, or online platforms.
- Data Analysis: Processing responses to generalise findings to the population, accounting for sampling error (small differences between sample and population), reported as a margin of error.
- Team Structure: Involves researchers designing the study and investigators collecting data, ensuring consistency across respondents.
The chief advantage of the survey method is its ability to generalise results for a large population while studying only a small, representative sample. This makes it efficient, requiring minimal time, effort, and cost compared to studying an entire population (e.g., a census). For example, a survey of voting preferences in a few villages can predict state-wide election outcomes, providing an aggregated view of social trends.
8. Selecting a representative sample involves criteria to ensure it reflects the population’s characteristics, enabling generalizable findings. The key criteria are:
- Stratification: Identify and include all relevant sub-groups (strata) in the population, such as rural/urban sectors, class, caste, gender, age, or religion, depending on the research question. For example, a survey on religious attitudes must include members of all religions to reflect diversity.
- Randomisation: Ensure the actual selection of units (e.g., individuals, households, villages) is based purely on chance, avoiding bias. Techniques include drawing lots, using random number tables, or computer-generated random numbers. For instance, selecting only accessible villages near highways introduces bias, while random selection ensures fairness.
- Relevance to Research Objectives: Strata are chosen based on the study’s goals. For example, a survey on trade union attitudes must include workers, managers, and industrialists to capture diverse perspectives.
- Proportional Representation: Ensure strata are represented in proportion to their population share or research needs. For example, in a survey comparing small and large villages, equal numbers of each may be selected to give balanced weightage.
For instance, to study rural harmony, a sample might stratify villages by size (small/large), randomly select 10 from each, and ensure randomisation to reflect the state’s rural population accurately.
9. The survey method has several weaknesses:
- Lack of Depth: Surveys provide broad, aggregated data but cannot capture in-depth, subjective experiences due to limited time with each respondent. For example, a survey on unemployment rates doesn’t reveal personal struggles.
- Non-Sampling Errors: Inconsistencies in how investigators ask questions or record responses can introduce errors, as large teams make uniform implementation challenging. Complex questions may be misinterpreted.
- Limited Question Types: Surveys rely on structured questionnaires, restricting questions to those suitable for strangers. Sensitive or personal questions (e.g., about family conflicts) are often answered evasively or avoided.
- Dependence on Respondent Cooperation: Success depends on respondents’ goodwill, as a lack of trust or familiarity can lead to incomplete or untruthful answers.
- Inflexibility: The tightly structured questionnaire cannot be modified during data collection, limiting adaptability to unexpected insights.
- Potential for Misleading Results: Poor design or implementation can produce false estimates, especially if sampling or non-sampling errors are not addressed.
For example, a survey on religious attitudes may miss nuanced beliefs if questions are too rigid or respondents are reluctant to share openly.
10. The main features of the interview as a research method include:
- Guided Conversation: An interview is a flexible, guided conversation between the researcher and respondent, balancing structure and spontaneity, unlike the rigid questionnaires of surveys.
- Flexibility: Questions can be rephrased, reordered, or extended based on the conversation’s progress. Topics yielding rich data can be explored further, while unproductive ones can be cut short. For example, an interview about workplace challenges can delve deeper into personal experiences.
- Styles: Varies from loosely structured (using a topic checklist) to structured (specific questions), depending on the researcher’s preference and research goals.
- Recording Methods: Responses are recorded via video/audio, note-taking during the interview, or memory-based write-ups afterwards. Each method has trade-offs—recorders may make respondents uneasy, while memory-based recording risks missing details.
- Presentation: Interview transcripts may be edited for clarity or retain the original conversational flow, including asides, to preserve authenticity.
- Supplementary Use: Often used with other methods like surveys or participant observation to add depth. For example, interviews with key informants in a village study clarify survey findings.
- Dependence on Rapport: Success relies on building trust and mutual understanding, requiring interviewer skill to ensure honest, detailed responses.
Related Reads
For more topics, follow LeverageEdu NCERT Study Material today!
