IELTS Essay Topic: Some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars globally.

Q- Some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars globally. Others feel that it serves to prevent less ethical politicians from running a country and starting wars. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Ans– The role of patriotism in global conflicts is a topic that is widely debated. While some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars, others believe that it acts as a check against unethical politicians and can prevent conflicts from starting. In this essay, I will explore both arguments and provide my own perspective on how while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars.

On the one hand, those who believe that patriotism is the primary cause of wars suggest that nationalistic feelings can fuel hostility between countries. They argue that when people are taught to take pride in their country and defend it, they may support aggressive actions that lead to war. For instance, world wars were fought largely due to nationalistic beliefs, with each country believing in the superiority of its own culture and way of life. Patriotism can also exacerbate tensions between countries with different geopolitical interests, leading to violent conflicts.

On the other hand, some argue that patriotism serves as a safeguard against corrupt politicians who might start wars for their own benefit. By promoting national unity and accountability, patriotism can prevent less ethical politicians from taking control of a country and initiating conflicts. Additionally, cooperation between countries can be facilitated by patriotic pride, leading to peaceful resolutions of conflicts. Patriotism can also help to strengthen a country’s identity, creating a sense of peace and stability.

In my opinion, while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars. Many wars are fought for reasons that have little to do with patriotism. However, patriotism can help to promote cooperation and peace between countries. It is important to recognize the role that patriotic pride can play in bringing people together and working towards a common goal while also maintaining accountability and preventing aggressive actions.

In conclusion, patriotism can contribute to global conflicts, but it is not the sole cause of wars. It can prevent unethical politicians from starting wars, promote cooperation between countries, and create a sense of unity and identity. Striking a balance between patriotic pride and accountability is crucial to resolving conflicts peacefully and preventing aggression.

Analysis

Outline statement: The role of patriotism in global conflicts is a topic that is widely debated. 

Paraphrased statement: While some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars, others believe that it acts as a check against unethical politicians and can prevent conflicts from starting.

Thesis statement: In this essay, I will explore both arguments and provide my own perspective on how while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars.

Topic sentences- body paragraph 1: On the one hand, those who believe that patriotism is the primary cause of wars suggest that nationalistic feelings can fuel hostility between countries. 

Supporting evidence- body paragraph 1: They argue that when people are taught to take pride in their country and defend it, they may support aggressive actions that lead to war. 

Analysis- body paragraph 1: For instance, the world wars were fought largely due to nationalistic beliefs, with each country believing in the superiority of its own culture and way of life. Patriotism can also exacerbate tensions between countries with different geopolitical interests, leading to violent conflicts.

Topic sentences- body paragraph 2: On the other hand, some argue that patriotism serves as a safeguard against corrupt politicians who might start wars for their own benefit.

Supporting evidence- body paragraph 2: By promoting national unity and accountability, patriotism can prevent less ethical politicians from taking control of a country and initiating conflicts. 

Analysis- body paragraph 2: Additionally, cooperation between countries can be facilitated by patriotic pride, leading to peaceful resolutions of conflicts. Patriotism can also help to strengthen a country’s identity, creating a sense of peace and stability.

Topic sentences- body paragraph 3: In my opinion, while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars.

Supporting evidence- body paragraph 3:  Many wars are fought for reasons that have little to do with patriotism. 

Analysis- body paragraph 3: However, patriotism can help to promote cooperation and peace between countries. It is important to recognize the role that patriotic pride can play in bringing people together and working towards a common goal while also maintaining accountability and preventing aggressive actions.

Conclusion: In conclusion, patriotism can contribute to global conflicts, but it is not the sole cause of wars. It can prevent unethical politicians from starting wars, promote cooperation between countries, and create a sense of unity and identity. Striking a balance between patriotic pride and accountability is crucial to resolving conflicts peacefully and preventing aggression.

Vocabulary 

The role of patriotism in global conflicts is a topic that is widely debated. While some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars, others believe that it acts as a check against unethical politicians and can prevent conflicts from starting. In this essay, I will explore both arguments and provide my own perspective on how while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars.

On the one hand, those who believe that patriotism is the primary cause of wars suggest that nationalistic feelings can fuel hostility between countries. They argue that when people are taught to take pride in their country and defend it, they may support aggressive actions that lead to war. For instance, world wars were fought largely due to nationalistic beliefs, with each country believing in the superiority of its own culture and way of life. Patriotism can also exacerbate tensions between countries with different geopolitical interests, leading to violent conflicts.

On the other hand, some argue that patriotism serves as a safeguard against corrupt politicians who might start wars for their own benefit. By promoting national unity and accountability, patriotism can prevent less ethical politicians from taking control of a country and initiating conflicts. Additionally, cooperation between countries can be facilitated by patriotic pride, leading to peaceful resolutions of conflicts. Patriotism can also help to strengthen a country’s identity, creating a sense of peace and stability.

In my opinion, while extreme nationalistic sentiments can lead to conflict, they are not the primary cause of wars. Many wars are fought for reasons that have little to do with patriotism. However, patriotism can help to promote cooperation and peace between countries. It is important to recognize the role that patriotic pride can play in bringing people together and working towards a common goal while also maintaining accountability and preventing aggressive actions.

In conclusion, patriotism can contribute to global conflicts, but it is not the sole cause of wars. It can prevent unethical politicians from starting wars, promote cooperation between countries, and create a sense of unity and identity. Striking a balance between patriotic pride and accountability is crucial to resolving conflicts peacefully and preventing aggression.

Linkers and Connectors Used in the Above Essay

• On the one hand / On the other hand: Used to introduce two contrasting viewpoints or arguments.
• They argue that: Used to introduce a viewpoint or argument made by others.
• For instance: Used to give an example to support an argument.
• However: Used to indicate a contrasting viewpoint or argument.
• In my opinion: Used to indicate the author’s viewpoint or argument.
• While: Used to indicate a contrasting viewpoint or argument.
• On the other hand: Used to introduce a contrasting viewpoint or argument.
• In conclusion: Used to signal the author’s conclusion.
• It is important to recognize: Used to emphasize a point.
• To strive to: Used to express the importance of an action or objective.

Are you preparing for IELTS? Check out this video to improve your writing skills for the IELTS exam given below👇.

Related Articles

• IELTS Writing Task 1
• IELTS Essay Topics

Download the Leverage IELTS App today.

Need help to prepare for IELTS? Check out the best IELTS preparation courses in the market offered in a live training environment by trusted educators in a live training environment. If you want help studying abroad, call 1800-572-130.